02 March 2009
Churches warn Prime Minister on moral challenge of climate change
Three church leaders have added their voices to The Church of
England and The Church of Scotland's in warning the Prime Minister
that not acting urgently at the Copenhagen Climate Change
Conference would be a "moral failure".
The Methodist Church, The Baptist Church and The United Reformed Church have backed Anglican Bishops who said the European Council must seize the opportunity this month to agree a strategy to secure an effective response to climate change at the Copenhagen Conference in December.
Revd Jonathan Edwards, General Secretary of The Baptist Union of Great Britain, Revd Stephen Poxon, President of The Methodist Conference and Revd John Marsh, Moderator of the General Assembly of The United Reformed Church, wrote to the Prime Minister criticizing the European Commission Communication of January 28 and calling for a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen.
"We believe that the recent Communication of the European Commission fails to set out clear proposals for a comprehensive, ambitious and equitable new global agreement on climate change," said the church leaders.
"The current recession stands to impact many in our communities and we recognise that EU Heads of Governments are tempted to use the immediacy of the economic crisis to shy away from taking long-term action on climate change. We are convinced that it would be short-sighted to stimulate economic growth without simultaneously addressing deficiencies in the relationship between economy and ecology.
"We recognise that challenges facing you and other EU Heads of Government when you meet in Brussels in March will be immense," said the church leaders in their letter. "Yet, if Copenhagen 2009 is to be the moment in history in which humanity has the opportunity to rise to the challenge and decisively deal with climate change, then key aspects of the EU's negotiating position need revision."
The letter also advises Gordon Brown that the January 28 Communication needs two revisions. Firstly, the EU's emission reductions targets must be clearly aligned with scientific evidence to limit long-term global warming to less than two degrees centigrade. Secondly, the EU should invest the financial equivalent of an additional 15 per cent emission reduction in developing countries by 2020.