Methodist Conference debates AI

The Methodist Conference has debated and considered the use of and implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in training and other aspects of Church life.

In 2024, the Conference was asked to consider the implications of AI and its practical and theological impact across the Methodist Church. A report was prepared for this year’s Conference on how the Church should respond to the technology, which was debated by representatives.

AI is developing rapidly and is used regularly for many daily tasks.

Concern has been raised that use of text-generating AI to write sermons or prayers reduces the potential for depth of theological learning in the preacher and their resonance with those who hear them. Theologically, there has been talk of how this impacts the idea of humanity being made in the image of God.

There has also been concern around the environmental impact of certain AI models which  use a lot of water and other precious resources in their server systems.

However it is recognised that AI can be of great help in performing routine and organisational tasks in the Church, is easily available and cheap or free to those who use it.

A working group was formed to investigate the theological, ethical and practical questions raised by AI; assist the Church in understanding how these developments affect its ministry and mission; offer guidance for the Church’s life and practice, and to indicate areas requiring further work.

Recommendations adopted by the Methodist Conference included the development of appropriate guidance that would be available across the Connexion and directing the Ministries Committee to consider how material on theological, ethical and practical implications of AI can be included within training for ordained and lay ministries.

The report emphasises that while AI can be a great tool to help with organisation, it should not be used to replace pastoral care, theological reflection or personal judgement.

The report reads: “AI tools may assist tasks within the life of the Church, but do not exercise ministry in themselves. Responsibility for worship, teaching, pastoral care and leadership remains with those called and appointed to these roles. Accordingly, AI may appropriately support preparation, organisation and administration. However, it should not be treated as a substitute for personal judgement, theological reflection or relational engagement.

“The intention is not to discourage use, but to ensure honesty regarding authorship and accountability. The working group heard evidence of a consistent instinct that pastoral care depends upon relationships, attentiveness and responsibility for another person. AI may assist communication or organisation, but care should be taken where its use risks replacing human listening or obscuring personal accountability.

“No single individual is expected to resolve these alone. Churches, circuits and districts are encouraged to reflect together, seeking practices that support ministry while preserving trust, responsibility and care.”

Ben Hollebon, Director of Digital and Transformation, said: “AI offers real possibilities and the Church needs to be wise and discerning in responding to them. We want the Church to meet it with hope rather than fear. And our hope is never only for ourselves. As these tools become part of everyday life, we want to join in solidarity with the people most easily left behind, so that what becomes possible for some becomes possible for all."
Gratitude was expressed to Izzy Soloman for her work on the survey, analysis of data and creation of The Artefact which is available to display at church events.